Donald Tusk has reassured MPs that a Brexit extension is still on the table as they prepare for a Commons showdown on Boris Johnson’s new deal.

Two crucial votes on Tuesday evening will determine whether the Prime Minister will be able to live up to his “do or die” commitment to take the UK out of the European Union by the October 31 deadline.

French President Emmanuel Macron and EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker had applied pressure on MPs with hints that Mr Johnson’s deal is the last and that any further delay may not be granted.

But European Council president Mr Tusk said the latest request for an extension to Article 50 should be treated “in all seriousness” as he consults EU leaders over the requested delay and MPs prepare to debate the Withdrawal Agreement Bill (WAB).

“It is obvious that the result of these consultations will very much depend on what the British Parliament decides, or doesn’t decide,” he said in a speech at the council on Tuesday.

“We should be ready for every scenario. But one thing must be clear: as I said to Prime Minister Johnson on Saturday, a no-deal Brexit will never be our decision.”

The new Brexit deal must also win backing from the European Parliament but its Brexit co-ordinator, Guy Verhofstadt, suggested “all problems faced by EU27 nationals in the UK need to be solved” first.

His demands include no citizens being deported from Britain if they miss the deadline for settled status in order to prevent “another Windrush scandal”.

As his time in the top job comes to a close, Mr Juncker said it has “pained” him to spend so much time dealing with Brexit, which he described as “a waste of time and a waste of energy”.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier also told the European Parliament that “this is the only possible agreement”, signalling it is the last deal any PM can broker.

POLITICS Brexit
(PA Graphics)

It came as Downing Street warned that a no-deal Brexit would be more likely if MPs reject the Government’s proposed timetable for the passage of the WAB through Parliament.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman told a Westminster briefing: “Voting down a programme motion has serious implications.

“It means legislation can drift on and on, and that is not in the interests of the UK or the European Union, which has made clear itself that it wishes to move on.”

Asked if voting down the motion would lead to a Brexit delay, he said: “Voting down the programme motion risks handing control over the situation to the European Union and therefore making no-deal more likely.”

The spokesman refused to comment on alternative plans if the programme motion falls, saying: “We would set that out in due course so what we’re focused on is first winning support for a deal.

“If MPs do finally vote for a deal, the public will rightly expect them to get on with passing the legislation so that we can leave on October 31.”

But the PA news agency understands the Government is considering pulling the entire Bill if the programme motion fails.

A programme motion is thought to have only been defeated once before – on House of Lords reform in 2012 – which led to the Bill being pulled.

Amid criticism over the short time MPs have to scrutinise the deal, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick said he saw no reason they could not “move quite quickly”.

“I suspect there will be MPs who would not have voted for this even if they had had until Christmas to debate this,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

Ministers have insisted they are confident they have the numbers to get the WAB through the Commons, despite their defeat in Saturday’s special sitting.

However, they face a fierce parliamentary struggle after announcing plans to fast-track it through the lower House in three days, potentially paving the way for the Lords to consider it over the weekend.

They will need MPs to approve a “programme motion” laying out the timetable for its passage through the Commons, setting up a crunch vote on Tuesday evening.

Many MPs are deeply unhappy that there is so little time for detailed scrutiny of such an important Bill, which runs to 110 pages with another 124 pages of explanatory notes.

Rory Stewart, who was among the 21 rebels against no-deal exiled from the Tories, suggested he could back the WAB but not back the programme motion.

“That doesn’t mean extending until the end of the year but it does mean we need a few days to do it properly,” he told Today.

“If we don’t do it properly, we are going to undermine the thing from the beginning.”

Leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg had warned that the programme motion was essential if they were to meet the Halloween deadline.

“People who do not vote for the programme motion will not be voting for Brexit on October 31,” he said.

Failure to get the motion through would open up the prospect that Mr Johnson will be forced to accept another lengthy delay to Britain’s departure – something he has vowed not to do.

The first vote on Tuesday will be on the Bill’s “in principle” second reading, while Labour-backed amendment attempts to secure a customs union and a second referendum could follow.

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell was insisting they would not be “wrecking” amendments but a bid to “secure a decent way forward we could all support”.

Despite the opposition of the DUP over arrangements for Northern Ireland, ministers believe they have the support of pro-Leave Labour rebels and former Tory MPs now sitting as independents who would rather leave with Mr Johnson’s deal than no deal at all.

If they get through the second reading, the Government will hope it gives the momentum to carry through the programme motion as well.

If that passes, under the proposed timetable, the Bill would then move to the committee stage – which will continue on into Wednesday – when MPs will have the opportunity to put down amendments.

These are expected to include attempts to keep the UK more closely aligned with the EU through a customs union and to stage a second referendum.

Both are bitterly opposed by the Government, raising the possibility that it could pull the Bill altogether if either gets through.