BRADFORD Council has agreed it should review its policy for unauthorised encampments, following a motion put forward by Councillor Andrew Loy (Conservative, Ilkley) which highlighted the effect on sites such as Ilkley Lido.

The motion noted that some sites in the district, including Ilkley, Marley and Odsal, have frequently been occupied by travellers in illegal encampments. It further noted that “the courts have often been involved to ensure the departure of the culprits and further expense has been required to clean up, make safe and try to secure the sites afterwards”.

Councillor Loy referred to an incursion onto the Lido site in June and July this year, when staff were subjected to verbal abuse and intimidation and the Lido was forced to close for a week, preventing children and families from using its facilities.

While he welcomed the height barriers and boulders which the council has placed around Middleton’s green spaces, he said that travellers had used a JCB or similar machine to move the boulders and gain access to West Holmes Field shortly after the incident at the Lido.

The motion called for the council to investigate using so-called “newcomer injunctions” to bar travellers from certain sites, which could speed up their removal. It noted that at least 38 local authorities have already sought to impose “no-go zones” for travellers and a Supreme Court ruling on 29 November 2023 confirmed that councils can use injunctions in this way, provided that a number of legal tests are met.

Councillor Loy concluded by saying: “We have a clear choice. Either we sit on our hands and tell increasingly frustrated residents that there is nothing more we can do. Or we can be proactive, investigate the options available, and strive to prevent the annual disruption which residents face and the costs which this council incurs in dealing with illegal encampments.”

The motion was passed following an amendment by the Labour Group.

Cllr Sarah Ferriby, Bradford Council’s portfolio holder for healthy people & places, said: “The Labour Group had to amend Cllr Loy’s motion to make it more workable and our suggested amendment was voted through.

“We have made clear that antisocial behaviour in any form and wherever it occurs will not be tolerated. As the result of a recent Supreme Court ruling all councils will have to reconsider any future applications for district wide or extended time period injunctions. Giving proper consideration to the provision of transit sites or negotiated stopping sites for the Gypsy and Traveller communities is also important.

“We also have a strategy around the gypsy and traveller community which has been drafted in consultation with their representatives. We want to implement this at pace so that we have sensible measures in it for everyone and deliver best value for the taxpayer. Our wider strategy must also seek to address the shocking inequalities in health and education outcomes that are experienced by gypsy and traveller communities.”

Speaking after the meeting, Councillor Loy said: “I’m glad the council has at least agreed it should review its policy. However, I was shocked to hear the Greens call it “an appalling use of council time” to discuss any restrictions on travellers. This is a real concern for many residents and can’t just be brushed under the carpet in the name of political correctness.”

Bradford Council currently provides two official sites for travellers, at Mary Street and Esholt.