A bridge too far?

ONCE again we see bad propaganda foisted on people here. When will BBA realise that which they think are stepping stones are not and never have been. Stepping stones stand upright in river and stream beds. They do so to allow passage above water level. Those below the mill dam are not and never have been stepping stones. That folk are able to cross is purely incidental.

The principle reason for being laid lengthways is to direct the under current away from river banks. Anyone with knowledge of that area of riverbank and bed will tell BBA this. They also make no mention of the ancient ford which crosses the river just below the current control barrier. What will happen to that if ever a bridge is erected? How will horse riders access said ford if there is a bridge in the way?

Another part of Burley’s fast disappearing industrial heritage will be lost if this nonsensical plan is carried forward. The Bridge Association are very good at pointing out Burley has never had a bridge. However the mill had one when in operation. I understand from Burley residents the foundations are still in place. Why hasn’t BBA followed through on that? Looking at photographs of the river in flood, I share the concerns of John Stubbs regarding flood debris, and do wonder if BBA really understand the river.

Travelling from Otley it became obvious how dangerous hoards of walkers will make that road. It isn’t made for pedestrian passage in large numbers. I suggest residents on the north side will be under pressure to have footpaths through their village and abroad. Followed by lighting and all the other things urban folk deem necessary to walking beside a busy road. Common sense is the answer to why this is a bridge too far.

Frazer Irwin Queens Road, Ilkley